This post by Ian Miller first appeared at Bleeding Heartland and is shared here as part of the Iowa Writers Collaborative. For regular emails linking to all recent Bleeding Heartland articles and commentary, subscribe to the free Evening Heartland newsletter.
Ian Miller is the author of The Scything Handbook (New Society Publishers, 2016). His writing has appeared in Mother Earth News, the apparently-now-defunct Permaculture Magazine and Seed Savers Exchange publications. He is a former semi-professional musician, having recorded and toured with numerous bands. Originally from Dubuque, he has lived in San Francisco and Austria and now resides in Decorah with his wife and two children.
On Thursday, May 18, I received an email from the Decorah Community School District's superintendent. He wrote:
He included what appeared to be copy from a press release provided by Iowa Attorney General Brenna Bird's office:
Sure enough, my middle schooler came home the next day with this envelope:
A few things didn't sit right with me about this. First, the largest font was reserved for Brenna Bird's name in all caps. (The envelopes used for the same program in Texas featured the state's official seal, not the attorney general's name.)
Further, the inclusion of large logos from Alliant—Decorans will not soon forget that company's dirty tricks in quashing a potential public electrical utility—MidAmerican Energy...and the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers?
And then that bottom line, "Over 1,000 children go missing everyday [sic]," which unfortunately was repeated uncritically in the email from the school superintendent.
They're saying more than 365,000 children go missing every year? With about 73 million children under 18 in this country, that would be about 1 in 200 kids going missing every year! Which would translate to at least seven or eight missing kids every year in Decorah that I'm not hearing anything about. (I counted 171 children under 18 listed as missing on the Iowa Department of Public Safety's website.)
Finally, the grammatical error right there at the bottom of the envelope felt like a "tell" that something fishy was going on here.
I decided to poke around and see what I could find about this program. Sure enough, ProPublica had just published an investigative piece about the National Child Identification Program in early May.
From that article by Kiah Collier and Jeremy Schwartz, I learned the actual number of children who go missing annually is about 100, according to studies by the Department of Justice. So a claim of 1,000 missing per day inflates the real number by a factor of 3,650.
It also turns out that they came up with this 1,000-per-day number only after pushback on the previous numbers they were using, which were “over 800,000 children are missing every year—that’s one every 40 seconds.” Bird parroted the made-up 800,000 figure when she announced Iowa's participation in this program last month.
What's more, ProPublica could find no evidence these kits have ever helped find a missing child. The kits project a vibe of being a preventative child-safety measure, but they clearly are not that. Furthermore, they do not educate children and families about avoiding dangerous situations, so could contribute to a false sense of security regarding prevention.
So what's the deal? Why are Iowa kids carrying home these fearmongering child ID kits, with Alliant and MidAmerican covering the full $1.5 million cost, according to Bird?
It turns out former National Football League player Kenny Hansmire is the main guy behind this outfit. See the ProPublica article for a more detailed bio. The short version: the National Child Identification Program is his grift, and he's apparently got millions of dollars in tax debt.
But since there's no evidence that these kits are effective, why has Bird entered into a public-private partnership with Alliant and MidAmerican to distribute them to Iowa schoolchildren? Especially since the state could distribute similar kits for lower cost or even free, courtesy of the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, a non-profit Congress created in the 1980s?
The short answer is, nobody outside Bird's circle knows. The ProPublica piece points out that the National Child Identification Program likes to lavish awards on cooperative politicians during halftime shows at NFL games. I'll be curious to see if Bird receives anything like that this fall.
I hope it's true that no public monies are being used for Iowa's participation in the child ID program. But given past scandals in Governor Kim Reynolds' office, I'm less than completely reassured by Bird's statements.
And furthermore, given the prominent, front-and-center placement of Bird's name on the kits' envelopes, is it appropriate for private entities to be funding such a venture? Would it be OK for a private entity to pay for a public relations firm to promote an elected official?
Indeed, this whole venture comes across as a PR stunt by Iowa's attorney general. She gets to distribute envelopes to Iowa households with her name front and center, scaring parents with made-up numbers about missing children. She's also selling parents false hope by claiming to be doing something for children's safety; see the large "Helping Protect Your Family" on the back side of the envelope.
In addition, Bird gets to bask in the apparent endorsement of Alliant, MidAmerican, and the IBEW. (She never mentions the electrical workers' union when speaking publicly about this program, so I wonder to what degree they are even involved.) Who knows, maybe she'll get some shiny award at halftime of an NFL game this fall.
Editor's note from Laura Belin: Bleeding Heartland sought comment from the Iowa Attorney General's office about the child ID program four times between May 9 and May 24. Is the office aware of any case where these child ID kits were used to solve a crime or identify a missing child? Did anyone on Bird's staff do due diligence on this program before committing funds to it?
Press secretary Alyssa Brouillet did not respond to any of the messages.
More photos by Ian Miller of materials provided in the envelope his child brought home from school are available at Bleeding Heartland.
The Iowa Writers Collaborative continues to grow. All of these authors provide content for free, with paid subscription options. Listed here in alphabetical order:
Laura Belin: Iowa Politics with Laura Belin, Windsor Heights
Doug Burns: The Iowa Mercury, Carroll
Dave Busiek: Dave Busiek on Media, Des Moines
Art Cullen: Art Cullen’s Notebook, Storm Lake
Suzanna de Baca Dispatches from the Heartland, Huxley
Debra Engle: A Whole New World, Madison County
Julie Gammack: Julie Gammack’s Iowa Potluck, Des Moines and Okoboji
Joe Geha: Fern and Joe, Ames
Jody Gifford: Benign Inspiration, West Des Moines
Nik Heftman: The Seven Times, Los Angeles and Iowa
Beth Hoffman: In the Dirt, Lovilla
Dana James: New Black Iowa, Des Moines
Pat Kinney: View from Cedar Valley, Waterloo
Fern Kupfer: Fern and Joe, Ames
Robert Leonard: Deep Midwest: Politics and Culture, Bussey
Tar Macias: Hola Iowa, Iowa
Kurt Meyer, Showing Up, St. Ansgar
Wini Moranville, Wini’s Food Stories, Des Moines
Kyle Munson, Kyle Munson’s Main Street, Des Moines
Jane Nguyen, The Asian Iowan, West Des Moines
John Naughton: My Life, in Color, Des Moines
Chuck Offenburger: Iowa Boy Chuck Offenburger, Jefferson and Des Moines
Barry Piatt: Piatt on Politic Behind the Curtain, Washington, D.C.
Macey Spensley: The Midwest Creative, Iowa
Larry Stone: Listening to the Land, Elkader
Mary Swander: Mary Swander’s Buggy Land, Kalona
Mary Swander: Mary Swander’s Emerging Voices, Kalona
Cheryl Tevis: Unfinished Business, Boone County
Ed Tibbetts: Along the Mississippi, Davenport
Teresa Zilk: Talking Good, Des Moines
To receive a weekly roundup of all Iowa Writers’ Collaborative columnists, sign up here (free): ROUNDUP COLUMN
We are proud to have an alliance with Iowa Capital Dispatch.
The photo with Mike Singletary is noteworthy. While I supported his football play, in recent years Singletary has travelled with and supported Trump. I do not know if he has campaigned in Iowa for Repub candidates. On another note, one definition of a scam is trying to sell something as your product or your idea, when it is free in the marketplace.
I received one of these today with my 2nd grade child’s end of year evaluation. This is part of Republicans’ well established messaging strategy. Instead of policy details they communicate with emotionally charged messaging that evokes fear and/or anger. It’s exploitative and like it or not it’s very effective with low information voters. What bothers me more than the message is that school districts participated in distributing it.